Skip to content
Atmiq

Why air-quality apps disagree

A step-by-step way to compare apparently conflicting readings without assuming that one service must be wrong.

Editorial illustration of a phone, clock and notebook beside a city window.
Editorial illustration · Everyday decisions, informed by air-quality data.

First compare the place and the time

Read the label behind the number

Four details that make a reading useful

01Pollutant
PM2.5, PM10 or another pollutant?
02Unit / index
µg/m³ or a named AQI scale?
03Time
Current hour, daily average or forecast?
04Source
A station observation or a model?
Use this checklist to compare services. A colour or a large number alone is not enough. AirNow ↗

Two services may use different monitors, update at different times or show a nearby location rather than the same point. Compare the coordinates or station name, timestamp and data source before comparing values. A monitor observation and a regional model should not be expected to match exactly.

Then compare the thing being displayed

One screen may show PM2.5 concentration, another an AQI, and another a forecast. AQI rules also differ across jurisdictions: the US AQI is EPA’s system, while the EEA maintains a European index. A shared colour name or a similar number does not make the scales equivalent.

Look for method labels, not a winner

Check pollutant, unit, averaging period and whether the data are measured, modelled or forecast. AirNow’s current NowCast itself uses multiple recent hours rather than a raw instant value. Clear labels let you decide which source best fits the question you have, instead of treating every difference as evidence of bad faith.

Sources

Educational information; personal health questions belong with your clinician.

Explore next

The 48-hour forecast is part of Atmiq Premium in the app. Get Premium →